LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity)     25 February 2012

Estranged wife steals job letter,passport & work visa.....

 

Estranged wife steals job letter, passport & work visa; hubby tells HC he can’t pay alimony

 

 

 

 

 

An attempt to get even with her estranged husband boomeranged on the wife. Saurav Chowdhary, 31, and Sangeetha, 28, tied the knot a few years ago, but are now involved in a messy divorce case.



Saurav, a software engineer, has told the High Court of Karnataka that Sangeetha had made it impossible for him to earn a livelihood as she had taken away the appointment letter for a job in Singapore, his passport and work visa. Saurav's advocate told the court that if he did not join work soon, he would not be able to pay the Rs 23,000 monthly alimony he had been paying Sangeetha.
 
Sangeetha, who hails from Kolkata, has returned to her parents' home, while Saurav resides in Bangalore. She has filed cases under Section 498(A) of the  Indian Penal Code  and under the Domestic Violence Act.
 
The cases are being heard in a lower court, but Sangeetha had filed a fresh case in the high court, alleging that the police were supporting her husband who had filed a false complaint against her.
 
All this was triggered by a trespass complaint Saurav has filed with the Mahadevpura police station. He alleged that his wife entered his house and took away 16 different items, including gold jewellery, his marks cards,  the appointment letter, passport and work visa. 
 
Justice N Ananda went through the list of items allegedly taken away by Sangeetha. “She may get some of these items in the final settlement... Let her keep the gold items,” the judge said. “But, she should give back the marks cards, the appointment letter and the passport. Let him live. He has to survive. Was he not paying her maintenance that she took away these things?” he asked.
 
The government advocate told the court that the parties were not willing to compromise and the advocates were unable to help them. The court ordered that Sangeetha be present for the next hearing along with all the items she had taken away. The case was adjourned to March 6.


Let him live. He has to survive. Was he not paying her maintenance that she took away these things?


JUSTICE N ANANDA, High court judge
 


Learning

 4 Replies

bhima balla (none)     25 February 2012

This is agood case for analysis:-all this needs to be proved of course-suppose the story is true

1) A vindictive wife steals the passport/visa along with her jewellery-she should not only be charged with criminal trespas but also with theft. In fact theft carries more weight as opposed to tespas-since she is wife of the person.

Theft is a cognizable and non bailable offence carries 3 years jail time!

This carries same weight as 498a except that it is compundable (maybe 498a is becoming compundable). In other words the woman in question should have been arrested for recovery.

I don't think that she was! Does that smack of woman bias?

Just an example of bad woman protected by law and the current process/system. SHould the husband not get compensation due to loss of income? Maybe they ought to cancel her maintenance and get her to work!

2 Like

bhima balla (none)     25 February 2012

This is a good case for analysis:-all this needs to be proved of course-suppose the story is true

 A vindictive wife steals the passport/visa along with her jewellery-she should not only be charged with criminal trespas but also with theft. In fact theft carries more weight as opposed to tespas-since she is wife of the person.

Theft is a cognizable and non bailable offence carries 3 years jail time!

This carries same weight as 498a except that it is compoundable (maybe 498a is becoming compoundable). In other words the woman in question should have been arrested for recovery.

I don't think that she was arrested! Does that smack of woman bias?

Just an example of bad woman protected by law and the current process/system. SHould the husband not get compensation due to loss of income? Maybe they ought to cancel her maintenance and get her to work!.

Justice would not be served if she can just return the articles and then go scot free!

1 Like

Ranee....... (NA)     25 February 2012

Yes.Agree with above writer.


(Guest)

Roshni aapki post padhne me kafi muskil ho rahi hai. lines overlap hai. but not with the other postings. any help from anybody?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register