Hi friends, Under 125, judge just ordered to pay 20K to my wife and daughter. that also from 2008 beginning.
My wife claimed that I was earning 72k p.m in 2007, but could not gave any proof. In my deposition to court I told that I am earning from consulting and gave the agreements with my two clients which show that I earn 15k p.m collectively. Their advocate objected and said that issuing authority of those contract should exibit these documents. Judge said that mere exibiting the documents does not mean that it is proof of income and he said that is accepting the documents on record. But at last we have seen this judgement. one of the point he mentioned that there was no proof of income. Questions coming in our mind are :
1. Even if is not considered as proof, the court should have told this and given us opportunity of being heard further or court might have done further investigation on that
2. Wife could not proov my income, then under what basis he gave this order (order copy is still awaited)
3. What is evidence for proof of income in this case
4. Shall we go for revision and stay order in HC
Kindly advice
