Greedy sister in law

sell the property if you find a good buyer.  Assuming but not admitting that even you had given a call and offered her 25 lakhs, that promise as per law will not bind you to pay such an amount.  If she moves to court and get a stay under DV Act, then it will be problem to you to get the stay vacated.

sell the property if you find a good buyer.  Assuming but not admitting that even you had given a call and offered her 25 lakhs, that promise as per law will not bind you to pay such an amount.  If she moves to court and get a stay under DV Act, then it will be problem to you to get the stay vacated.

If Rastrapati bhawan belongs to husband (he has to b Rastrapati)then wife can claim residence right in it!

Why your advocate told her she wud be given 30 lacs out of your flat sale?She is not entitled..because to maintain her is not your duty and according to above judgement she cant claim shared household in it.

But if she files whole process would get delayed to establish these facts.

Thank you so much all answering my query.  I understood the fact that, husband , wife can stay at donez of place that doesn't mean wife has right to claim every property as her matrimonial home.

As per supereme court judgement in batra case

If the aforesaid submission is accepted, then it will mean that wherever the husband
and wife lived together in the past that property becomes a shared household. It is quite
possible that the husband and wife may have lived together in dozens of places e.g. with
the husband's father, husband's paternal grand parents, his maternal parents, uncles, aunts,
brothers, sisters, nephews, nieces etc. If the interpretation canvassed by the learned
Counsel for the respondent is accepted, all these houses of the husband's relatives will be
shared households and the wife can well insist in living in the all these houses of her
husband's relatives merely because she had stayed with her husband for some time in
those houses in the past. Such a view would lead to chaos and would be absurd..

It is well settled that any interpretation which leads to absurdity should not be accepted.

The above judgement is enough guideline . Like someone mentioned earlier , case will get clear but it will take some time (may be 14 to 15 years) .  I don't have control over people emotion and thoughts, people do get greedy and out of frustartion they do take decision which they are not supposed  and end up with trouble for themselves.  We will see , what other mistake she does to get herself in trouble.

Meanwhile , I will do research of following IPC act

Thank you renee. advocate suggested my brother''s wife. She delivered the notice to my society secretary and my brother personally mentioning fact that " she wants 30 lakh out of my property sale "  :-).  either Advocate was not thinking properly before he suggested her to demand for money or he is an big idiot to suggest demand of money in writing from me because her husband is unemployed. :-) 

In nutshell, it's husband and wife fight. They can resolve their issue, my question was why they involved me when i don't live in country  Stupid lawyer didnt even think about I have passport stamp where i can prove i was not in the country itself.  Phone records that how many time i have called india :-) 

Anyway, we will see how things goes. Hope my brother and his wife think about their  little one and patch the things up rather then running behind money.

so, As per indian kanoon , just file FIR, make claim , harrash people then we will see what we need to say in court. :-).   I agree she can claim whatever she wants from her husband as maintenance but claiming money from husband's sister is height of law :-) and height of greedyness "  :-)  

she won't try to patch up..because 30lacs > unemployed husband...

:D

Shows one more example of misuse of a law that is illframed and vague! PWDVA is framed to be misused.

Wonder what is the recourse-suppose the true owner wants to sell due to some financial emergency and suffers damage as a result of misuse of PWDVA? Another 30 years in a civil suit?