dear mr.sawant
yes, you are right in saying that RTI act has to be utilised. but it cannot be a roving exercise.
one must know the details of the cases involved well. even then a reply by the PIO cannot form the basis of a corruption charge.
my point is: when the whole society is rotting with corruption, how can the judges be insultated from it? there was, there is and there will be corruption in judiciary. and like most politicians, the judges are basically lawyers and they know to get out of any tricky situations.
in our state, the dept of vigilance catches many govt officials taking bribe red handed. but no body knows what happens to the cases later. i think most are left free. i know of a top official who collected chunks of money for diwali festival (a IAS level officer) but was left without any proper case. what to do?
and yes, there are some good judges, but one swallow does not make a summer.