Sathiya Kumar 23 February 2018
Adv. SUNIL MHATRE 23 February 2018
Sathiya Kumar 23 February 2018
Kumar Doab (FIN) 23 February 2018
Take help of a very able senior LOCAL counsel of unshakable repute and integrity specializing in revenue/civil matters and having successful track record………………including the one that helped you in court and is well versed with full facts of the matter or another one….for a considered opinion after showing all case related papers, inputs ...
Generically speaking; Application for final decree could be made.
The partition by metes and bounds might be possible.
Compromise/mutual agreement might be possible.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 23 February 2018
You may pick up relevant points..
Supreme Court of India
Venu vs Ponnusamy Reddiar (Dead) Thr. Lrs ... on 27 April, 2017
Author: ................J.
Bench: Arun Mishra, Amitava Roy
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107642065/
20…………….. is pertinent in this regard, in which it has been observed that in case parties had affected partition by metes and bounds as per the preliminary decree, it would not be necessary to undertake the final decree proceedings but in the instant case, it has not been found to be established that parties have worked out their rights by mutual agreement. Thus the final decree has to be drawn in accordance with law. We appreciate the fairness with which the case has been argued by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.
Madras High Court
Varatharajulu Reddiar vs Venkatakrishna Reddiar And Ors. on 25 November, 1965
Equivalent citations: (1967) 2 MLJ 342
Author: M Natesan
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/889819/
12……………‘There will be need for division and allotment by the commissioner and a final decree only in respect of such items if any as have not been amicably divided and possession taken by the respective parties, in terms of their rights under the compromise decree, dated 7th August, 1959.’.