implication of criminal case on MACT claim

claim of victim can not be completely refused on the ground of his fault. but his fault is to be considered in assessing the amount of compensation.

I guess just to help the victim, police had fabricated this case.  In this case insurance company and owner both together fighting this against a fraudulant claim. Insurance company cannot fight except sct 149(2) or 170. So generally, they take the vakalatnama and defense from the owner to fight in MACT.

Insurance companies have found several cases where later it was proved that there is a collusion between police, advocates, doctors and victims to claim higher compensation. In fact recently supreme court has taken a note of this.

Real Question is how relevant is the criminal case? I guess, generally, the findings in the criminal cases are not applicable for MACT only it can be just used as an evidence. In this case, as the guilt plea is due to some external factors (police pressure, long litigation process etc) it can be not be relied-upon. Any thoughts?

kindly get the exact facts .

the fact of the case as per insurance company investigations - two wheeler while trying to negotiate/overtake other vehicle (sumo) skidded and collided with the maruti car coming from opposite direction. there are some photographs indicating damage for both the vehicles. car driver immediately called police and took the injured to hospital. but police involved the maruti car driver in the case. The two wheeler was not owned by the rider and it did not have registration mark (new vehicle). as per police FIR two-wheeler rider was brining his vehicle from RTO at 11:30 pm! MLC indicate accident between two-wheeler and Sumo. also insurance company found that two-wheeler rider did not posses valid DL at the time of accident.