Good evening everyone. Thank you so much for the responses.
@Rishi kumar: Have you got the proof of her sharing naked photos ?
RS: Yes Sir. I don't have screeshots of her original messages in her cellphone to the third person but I had forwarded her WhatsApp messages to my cellphone and I have her messaged photographs.
@Rishi kumar: And being human you apologised. Nothing wrong.
RS: It's encouraging to see that a third person, an unrelated person can think that way for a husband.
@Rishi kumar:So be truthful. Tell the court that there was an arguement over this issue. You don't have to shield her. If you have saved the photos screenshot, produce it as evidence.
RS: Yes Sir. I intend to be truthful because (a) I have nothing to hide (b) I cannot cook up any story to explain what happned and in any case I don't need to cook up a story. Of course, if it comes to that I shall admit that I had been rude to her (very rude, perhaps even mean) but I hope the Court will consider the reason for my being rude in the context of her actions, which were on account of her 'adventures' and nothing to do with dowry.
@Rishi kumar:not make unnecessary false allegations.
RS: No Sir. I'm not making any false allegations. I'm not even making any allegations at all, as yet nor do I intend to, in respect of the ugly truth, unless my hand is forced and I have no other way out.
@Vijay Raj Mahajan: Best advice for you is to agree for divorce.
RS: Yes Sir. Perhaps that's the best advice. I'm still coming to terms with the shock factor. After reading all the reponses here, I called her today only to ask her what was the way forward? What does she thinks she needs now? And she told me she'd think about the way forward once I come to Court and apologize before Court and beg her for a consensual divorce! Now, I understand that this is a lawyers' Forum and not a psychologists forum but maybe lawyers also gauge actions and intentions using some amateur psychology? I don't know about that. But I do know that she's talking and behaving in a very sadistic manner.
@adv. rajeev ( rajoo ): If you are relation is strained and there is no chance of reunion
RS: After reading her case and especially after speaking to her, there doesn't seem to be any comeback.
@Ramesh Singh:Sec.58 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Under Art. 20(3) of The Constitution of India
RS: Yes Sir. I read your response and I read about Art. 20. But I'm more worried about the sympathy factor/victim card rather than hard and fast rules of law. I don't mean to sound a chauvinist male but everywhere I see (like office environment) a couple of tears and everything says a lady says is true, logic be damned. As you may see resepcted Mr.Adv Raj Malhotra's kind response.
@Ankaraj Marri
RS: Right Sir. Fate!
@Kumar Doab The obscene pictures as posted by you are after marriage?
RS: The messages were post marriage but the snaps were pre marriage (we were barely together for four months).
@Kumar Doab Is any court case filed.
RS: Yes Sir. Divorce by her on the ground of crutely and dowry demand by me.
@Kumar Doab: If despite obscene pictures are shared with some other person after marriage and still if you have shown big heart then why there is any charge on you!
RS: Why a charge on me? Well, Sir. I don't know. I thought that I could put all that behind me and start afresh. Be that as it may Sir, that feels like a moot point now; numbing.
@Sumit Kumar
RS: Ok Sir.
@Sumit Kumar: Alleged trading of nude pics online is nothing short of prostitution. so why waste your life .
RS :`(
@Adv Radhika Mehta: Use of the word sorry itself shows that you have done something wrong, something worth apologizing for.
RS: Yes Ma'am. It does and I admit that. The way I spoke to her is perhaps not the way one would talk to his newly wedded wife. That it was provoked by her conduct is perhaps some explanation, if not justification, for my behavior.
@Adv Radhika Mehta: The word sorry in such a context can be interpretated in a hundred ways.
RS: True. She's saying I was sorry for cruelty and I'm going to say I was sorry for the ill mannered language I used, prompted by her actions. It's how the Court reacts to this, is what bothers me.
@Kumar Doab: Your query is not clear if any case in court has been filed or complaint with police has been filed.
RS: Kumar Sir, she has filed divorce case in which she says my apologetic messages to her is a proof that I was cruel to her and now apologizing for the same. As @Rishi kumar ji said, "she has not filed a 498a against you, that is sure to come" ... but I'm not aware of any, till now.
@Kumar Doab: Mukar Sakte Hain.
RS: True Sir. The way my honest attempt to placate her by apologizing has been twisted into aplogies for cruelty, कुछ भी कह सकती हैं
@Adv Raj Malhotra
RS: Sir, with all due respect, passive-agressive behavior is not frankness nor perhaps fearmongering. And while, I'm never afraid of the consequnces of what I had said or done I don't want to be saddled with consequences for something I never did. I appreciate your frankness and I hope that you are equally frank in real life too and tell your Clients to f**k off (incidentally, I wonder if such language is acceptable in Court or a law school).
A QUERY:
I found an article named "Legal Consequences of Apologizing" in Journal of University of Missouri and it relates purely to the United States. It says, "judges and juries understand that expression of sympathy, regret, remorse and apology are not necessarily admissions of responsibility or liability. This serves the public interest because such expressions have the potential to reduce the number of lawsuits". Will a Court in India give any weight to it?
Thank you all esteemed lawyers for your kind, valuable and frank response.
>>> Rajkumar Shastri