SC Decisions on Signature
In a case where the accused is alleged to have forged a signature on Bank Loan Documents, the Police FSL report confirms the forgery but the Prosecution fails to bring out the other details i.e. the officials in whose presence the signatures were made, The day, date & time etc when these signatures were forged
Can the accused be convicted?
Can anyone give some SC rulings on this type of case where the accused is NOT CONVICTED despite FSL report on signatures against him due to missing links in the prosecution story?
