Is it good to show UNEMPLOYED or LESS INCOME?
POINTS from different attorneys on Lawers-Club-India :-
(1) There are conflicting judgments delivered by Supreme Court and various High Courts on maintenance of earning wife. 25% of salary of husband has been granted in a CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5369 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 34653 of 2016) KALYAN DEY CHOWDHURY Versus RITA DEY CHOWDHURY NEE NANDY
(2) The Delhi High Court has further clarified a few more matters like, for husband, being jobless does not work as an excuse for not paying maintenance.
(3) Generally Court awards one third of your income, as a maintenance to wife and child.
BACKGROUND: -
- Hindu Marriage in 2007 -Son was born, out of wedlock in 2008.
-Husband/Myself, handicap due to accident, so wife left in 2009.
-Wife never let husband or husbands side of family to see his son.
-Husband filed for divorce in 2011. Husband unemployed due to handicap status.
-Whereas, wife is software Engineer, and earns Rs. 87,000 / month. And has a flat in Mumbai worth 5.75 Crores.
QUESTION: Because of being HANDICAP, I am unemployed, so that is what my lawyer has put forth in front of the court, but still the court ordered an interim maintenance of Rs. 9500 for my child (based on my Job that I had 9 years ago, before my accident). Wife is intentionally delaying the CrPC 125, by delay tactic, so should I actually show that I am UNEMPLOYED, or show that I am earning a non-regular income of say Rs.8000 to Rs. 10,000 by taking tuitions?
QUESTION - AGAIN: Is it good to show UNEMPLOYED or LESS INCOME?
ANALOGY/REASONING: If anyways Judges are extra lenient towards wifes and kids, then why leave it to Judges discretion/guestimate? If I am unemployed because of my HANDICAP status, and if the Judge can conveniently ignore that, then why not claim inclome of Rs. 10,000 and then pay only 1/3 of it as maintenance?