Bhika Reghiwale 16 May 2020
SHIRISH PAWAR, 7738990900 (Advocate) 16 May 2020
Helo,
As per me case filed by E uterion brother will have not work as rejudicata. Further winning case depends on case. You can post the case paper here so that experts can advice you.
Regards,
KISHAN DUTT KALASKAR (Advocate) 16 May 2020
I agree with the opinion of Expert Advocate Mr. SHIRISH PAWAR,
Hemant Agarwal (ha21@rediffmail.com Mumbai : 9820174108) 16 May 2020
Originally posted by : Bhika Reghiwale | ||
If A - is from Hindu joint family puchased land in the name of B and C .Where B is own daughter of A and C is brother's daughter of A.B and C are minorsA - had paid entire compassion from his own account.D is a father of CHence A and D are real brother'sNow if C is died in minor age of six years only.And if after so many days D lodged suit in court for 1/2 share and court gave judgement that A is a sole ower of this land After a gap of so many days another E - uterion brother of C , loadged the another suit for half share that stating that He is a legal heir of C as a "uterion brother"Please sir guide me whether this a1"resjudicata" case or not?2Can this case stand in the court and whether E will win it Note:-This is my own case running in civil court Hence I want your friendly openion. |
1. IF Court has already pronounced order that "A is a sole owner of this land", THEN the only thing remains for ANY claimant is to challenge the order and not file another matter. It would be abuse of law.
2. The above is more so specifically since "E" who being one of the legal Heir of "D", is bound by court order pronounced in adverse against "D" 's application.
Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal
VISIT: www.chshelpforum.com
Bhika Reghiwale 16 May 2020