@pratik
It was very interesting for me to read into S.6(c) HMG Act.
It clearly says that for a married girl, her husband is the guardian. It does not state any age limitation on this. So it means, when a child is begotten, then also she stays in the guardianship of her husband. And this status continues till her death. I draw inference from S.125CrPC for maintenance of wife, which is complimentary to the subject section because a person who is dependant on someone, should have a right to be maintained by the other.
But now, surprisingly we have a landmark judgment of Supreme Court of India, which states, that S.6(a)HMG Act, also include mother and the words after father does not says thas only after death of the father but even before that if father is not capable of maintaining the child, the mother would be the natura guardian. This judgment was pronounced and based on Art.14 & Art.15 of Constitution of India, on the name of gender equality and women empowerment and liberation.
Can you now understand that how confusing the situation is? A lady who is a dependant for her needs on a man, and that man is her guardian, but during thsi same status, she can be the guardian to another!!
How can a person be dependant on a person who herself is dependant?? How can we ensure that this dependant is capable of taking-care of the child?
Certainly, we live in a country full of diversity and confused law-makers.
//peace
/Saurabh..V