LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Shantanu Wavhal (Worker)     28 December 2013

Lesson teaching tools in crpc

107.   Security for keeping the peace in other cases.

 

(1)   When an Executive Magistrate receives information that any person is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility or to do any wrongful act that may probably occasion a breach of’ the peace or disturb the public tranquility and is of opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, he may in the manner hereinafter provided, require such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond 1[with or without sureties] for keeping the peace for such period, not exceeding one year, as the Magistrate thinks fit.

(2)   Proceeding under this section may be taken before any Executive Magistrate when either the place where the breach of the peace or disturbance is apprehended is within his local jurisdiction or there is within such jurisdiction a person who is likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility or to do any wrongful act as aforesaid beyond such jurisdiction.

 

108.  Security for good behaviour from persons disseminating seditious matters.

 

(1)   When 1[an executive Magistrate] receives information that there is within his local jurisdictions any person who, within or without such jurisdiction -

(i)    either orally or in writing or in any other manner intentionally disseminates or attempts to disseminate or abets the dissemination of-

(a)  any matter the publication of’ which is punishable under section 124A or section 153A or section 153B or section 295A of’ the Indian Penal Code (45 of’ 1860), or

(b)  any matter concerning a Judge acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duties which amounts to criminal intimidation or defarmation under the Indian Penal Code

(ii)   makes Produces, Publishes or keeps for sale, imports, exports, conveys, sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any other manner puts into circulation any obscene matter such as is referred to in section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860),

        And the magistrate is of opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, the Magistrate may, in the manner hereinafter provided, require such person to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond, with or without sureties, for his good behaviour for such period, not exceeding one year, as the Magistrate thinks fit.

(2)   No proceeding shall be taken under this section against the editor, proprietor, printer or publisher of any publication registered under, and edited, printed and published in conformity with, the rules laid down in the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 (25 of 1867), with reference to any matter contained in such publication except by the order or under the authority of the State Government or some officer empowered by the State Government in this behalf.

 

150.   Information of design to commit cognizable offences.

 

        Every police officer receiving information of a design to commit any cognizable offence shall communicate such information to the police officer to whom he is subordinate, and to any other officer whose duty it is to prevent or take cognizance of the commission of any such offence.

 

151.   Arrest to prevent the commission of cognizable offences.

(1)   A police officer knowing of a design to commit any cognizable offence may arrest, without orders from a Magistrate and without a warrant, the person so designing, if it appears to such officer that the commission of the offence cannot be otherwise prevented.

 

(2)   No person arrested under sub-section (1) shall be detained in custody for a period exceeding twenty-four hours from the time of his arrest unless his further detention is required or authorized under any other provisions of this Code or of any other law for the time being in force.

 

STATE AMENDMENT

Maharashtra:

In section 151 -

(a)   In sub-section (2), after the words “required or authorised” the words “under sub-section (3) or” shall be inserted;

(b)   After sub-section (2), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namely, -

“(3) (a)   
Where a person is arrested under this section and the officer making the arrest or the officer of the police station before whom the arrested person is produced, has reasonable grounds to believe that the detention of the arrested person for a period longer than twenty-four hours from the time of arrest (excluding the time required to take the arrested person from the place of arrest to the court of a Judicial Magistrate) is necessary by reason that-

(i)    The person is likely to continue the design to commit, or is likely to commit, the cognizable offence referred to in sub-section referred to in sub-section (1) after his release; and

(ii)   The circumstances of the case are such that his being at large is likely to be prejudicial to the maintenance of public order.

        The officer making the arrest, or the officer in charge of the police station, shall produce such arrested person before the nearest Judicial Magistrate, together with a report in writing stating the reasons for the continued detention of such person for a period longer than twenty-four hours.

 

(b)   Notwithstanding anything contained in this Code or any other law or the time being in force, where the Magistrate before whom such arrested person is produced is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for the temporary detention of’ such person in custody beyond the period of twenty-four hours, he may from time to time, by order remand such person to such custody as he may think fit

        Provided that, no person shall be detained under this section for a period exceeding fifteen days at a time, and for a total period exceeding thirty days from the date of arrest of such person.

 

(c)    When any person is remanded to custody- under clause (b), the Magistrate shall, as soon as may be communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made and such person may, make a representation against the order to the Court of Session. The Sessions Judge may on receipt of such representation after holding such inquiry is he deems fit, either reject the representation, or if he considers that further detention of the arrested person is not necessary, or that it is otherwise proper and Just so to do, may vacate the order and the arrested person shall then be released forthwith.”

 



Learning

 3 Replies

Shantanu Wavhal (Worker)     28 December 2013

also, make most of this ... IPC 182


1[182. False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person.—

 

Whoever gives to any public servant any information which he knows or believes to be false, intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, such public servant—

(a) to do or omit anything which such public servant ought not to do or omit if the true state of facts respecting which such information is given were known by him, or

(b) to use the lawful power of such public servant to the injury or annoyance of any person,

shall be punished with imprisonment of either descriptttion for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

Illustrations

 (a) A informs a Magistrate that Z, a police-officer, subordinate to such Magistrate, has been guilty of neglect of duty or miscon­duct, knowing such information to be false, and knowing it to be likely that the information will cause the Magistrate to dismiss Z. A has committed the offence defined in this section.

(b) A falsely informs a public servant that Z has contraband salt in a secret place knowing such information to be false, and knowing that it is likely that the consequence of the information will be a search of Z’s premises, attended with annoyance to Z. A has committed the offence defined in this section.

(c) A falsely informs a policeman that he has been assaulted and robbed in the neighbourhood of a particular village. He does not mention the name of any person as one of his assistants, but knows it to be likely that in consequence of this information the police will make enquiries and institute searches in the village to the annoyance of the villages or some of them. A has committed an offence under this section.]

CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENCE

Punishment—Imprisonment for 6 months or fine of 1,000 rupees, or both—Non-cognizable—Bailable—Triable by any Magistrate—Non-com­poundable.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     28 December 2013

What is the idea behind posting the above information?, the concerned sections are there and anyone can read it through a bare act itself, What is Mr. Amit trying to tell by posting the above information?

Shantanu Wavhal (Worker)     29 December 2013

:(


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register