This bill cutails powers of JUDICIARY and its basic tenets
This law dictates the Judiciary in areas where judiciary was expected to have independence and discretion of a reasonably prudent person!!!
E.g. Take evidence Act ------ The admissibility, relevancy and (most importantly in the current context) SUFFICIENCY of evidence ..............Until this bill becomes law, final and only authority is the court who decides whether any evidence whatsoever is sufficient to prove the allegation (in addition to its admissibility and relevancy)
Judge would be left with no discretion whatsoever ..... to apply his mind as to sufficiency of evidence ...Then why the hell make it a judicial process? ... give these powers to registrars instead !!
After the bill ................ Family Courts would be reduced to ... DIVORCE REGISTRATION DEPARTMENTS !!!!
Court counsellors would get more powerful than judge of family court, and a lot of new avenues for corruption would be created !!!!!!
BUT the time duration of whole process would again span for years ................. Yes!!!.... it is still possible to drag the process .................... for years in IRBM!!!!
..................... And mind well ....................... new generations of lawyers are very innovative !!!!!!
Suggestion of amendment:- Hence we should rename the FAMILY COURTS as DVORCE REGISTRARS as per HMA and SMA
MCD ......... Waiving the cooling off period ----------- SC HC case laws had already resolved this issue and Courts were already waiving cooling off period in MCD.
Share in Property ---- It was already there 'based on individual's contribution to property' after marriage.
This law would bring a fundamental change into Hindu religion ........... Wife gets rights to divorce without necessity to mention any reason whatsoever!!!! (A New system of Hindu female talaq with iddat period of 4 years ...... exactly opposite to islam, in hindu religion women would get arbitrary rights to leave their husband for no reasons whatsoever and on top of it women would be rewarded with 50% or even 100% property of husband .......... So this discretion of Court would be misused!!! ........... a new law of forfeiture of property os being introduced ........... Live-in relationship is advisable for men!!!!)
