@Dear memeber Mani,
One must be able to differentiate in what offence what is considered to admissible evidences.
Facebook is a public media.Therefore the charges of defamation can be filed.The question arises here as to whom the charges to be framed against.Well,then the police must establish that the person who posted there the content which considered to be a defamatory remark against someone else is really the same person by establishing the truth with cyber-technology. Here one must note-
(a)Defamation is a charge which is prima-facie a crime and the proof of such offence is the content itself.
(b)Who posted the content cannot be established marely by seeing at a USER ID. It's matter of investigation again.Can this user ID be produced as an evidence which is itself a suject of investigation??? Read 4-5 times if you fail to understand the difference.
In the answer to you question concering the high court decision about Facebook, The high court termed it cruelty because the content itself showed a defamatory statement against the wife which was taken as only a considertation in already established facts. Merely terming a facebook status, single or married, a ground for cruelty is far from established fact and cannot be accepted by any court of law.
@Querist,
You cannot get certified copy without any administrative order of the information you are seeking. One more thing,I want to add,It's the decision of court Legal proof obtained by any means is admissible.evidences. I have given you the pointer.Now it's your turn to act.
Note-This reply should be taken as per the declaration given in my profile page.
Thanks,
Regards,
