i filed divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. ->Good.
she filed reply to my divorce 2 days back denying all the allegations. -> Perfectly legal and according to norms.
i have full proof in video and audio format. let me know how i can produce this video/audio as my lawer says in the next hearing, i have to submit my statement. -> This all should be submitted during the trial stage.Not now.High cope of being misused
should i submit the evidence (video/audio) while giving the statement? if i do so, she will come to know that i have video/audio proofs and she will play different tactics in divorce case and the same in dvc/498a cases. DV/maintenance and 498 cases are different. Only submit proofs that are needed.
in dvc/498a cases also, she is not coming up to give statement and witnesses. -> Perfectly legal and according to norms.The opposite counsel is well learned.
now her divorce lawyer says we will file interim pertion in divorce to claim 1/3rd salary and legal expenses (nearly 5 lakhs).-> Perfectly according to norm if not counteracted with proofs.
please let me know is this acceptable by divorce judge?if so why, she left my home on her own accord, she didnt reply to my rcr notice and she stayed away 1 1/2 years from me. -> Mention your RCR notice to the family judge and that she is working.
moreover, she worked beofre marriage and now i came to know she is working in a school. she has her mother's propery and getting rent from 4 shops. she is the only girl in her family. . -> Mention your RCR notice to the family judge and that she is working, highly educated and not a indigent lady.
in this situation, how can court grant 1/3 of salary and legal expenses when the fault is her. -> Your lawyer should plead to the contrary.THIS IS A CRITICAL STAGE If he is unable,better to change him given the proofs that you have.In advance give him a notification to this effect.If unjust orders are passed this can be challenged in the higher courts.
pl let me know what i can do to dismiss her interim maintenace if she does so?