Cross examination is a way to get answers on the record to "frame" you later. It is a VERY IMPORTANT step in any litigation because your testimony can be used anytime in any future proceedings in any court. Therefore, it is important to pause before answering, forget any pressure from any advocate, frame your answer in your mind and then, and only then, should you open your mouth. Just like advocates like to frame witnesses, witnesses can out-smart them by giving ambiguous answers or answers with voluntary supplements as suggested by an advocate above. Now, if the judge does not record the voluntary part, ask the Judge to record your objection that your complete answer was not recorded. The Judge has a duty to record all objections during cross-examination. If he still does not record your objection, file a written application in the next hearing or in the same hearing asking the Judge to rectify the cross-examination and record your objections which you had raised during the cross-examination. You MUST raise the objection while the cross-examination is going on. You cannot do so later.
Presuming that you are the first to go on the stand and you later realize that you have given some answers that you are now regretting, do not sweat. Prepare to cross-examine the opposite party on the same points and get answers that dilute the damage done in your own cross-examination.
The litigation process is straight forward and somewhere in this forum I have listed the steps involved. Judgement is given only after arguments are held and in your written arguments, all your "opinion" can be stated.
Judge can given any order, including that of restitution of conjugal rights meaning asking you to go and live with him if the Judge finds that your refusal is not justified. But I do agree with the opinion above, that no Court can force you to live with someone you do not want to live with. Perhaps some advocate can resolve the conflict: What happens if a RCR application is granted and wife/husband refuse to abide by it? I
If you want to submit last-minute proofs, you have to file an application before the Judge issues an Order and explain why there was a delay in submitting the proofs. Then you should file an application to recall the witness so that the witness can be cross-examined on the newly submitted proofs to increase the value of the new evidence. It is possibly the only way to have them marked as exhibits on the record.
Finally, a word of advice that is not strictly legal: If you did have good times before, is it not possible for you to take a few steps backwards, pause for a few minutes and see if you can reconcile? Sometimes, taking a pause from litigation helps to clarify reality. Explore this possibility in all earnest. Filing a DV petition is a NO-NO. It will waste your time and money and his too. DV cases get you nothing more than what you can get in the current divorce litigation. Do not file false criminal cases either. If proven false, they can land you in a lot of trouble. If they file false criminal cases, the same applies to them, if the allegations are proven false.