Niacl compliance of assurance to parliamentary committee

You have rightly mentioned that being employee of the company you have limitations to complain against the employer company, hence the "Sansad Rajbhasha Smiti" should act and inform you on the outcome.

Have you received any reply?

You had posted the letter posted by N.Toppo earlier also. Have you received any more updates, results, after the letter of N.Toppo?

NIACL is compounding the issues and its problems. Their mindset is let the court decide and let the legal cell approach higher court and so on. And /or crop up other issues if reinstated. However you seem to have enough records and evidences to thwart the mollified intents and practices of the offender and corrupt employees of your company.

In labor court if the basic law in the case is not questionable it shall be difficult for the company. Your case seems to be in accordance with your basic lawful rights.

While it is advocated that even a mohalla association, shop on street, a local property dealer, worker's association, officer's association, managers’ association should be registered and should deal with only registered entities then why the highest paid, highly qualified, chiefs of the insurance companies have not registered this GIPSA?

DGM of NIACL has pleaded with Singhal of GIPSA to take up the matter in GM(personnel) meeting and issue guidelines. While insurance company chiefs enjoy stints in GIPSA, contribute to GIPSA, frame and pass guidelines, why they don't register this GIPSA?

Just to tell the court that "because it is not registered association, its name be struck off from the writ petition".

Courts have given landmark judgments. This case is fit for out of the box thinking on the matter.