ORDER
1.
This order of mine shall dispose of an application for interim
1
injunction filed under order 39 rule 1,2 read with Section 151 CPC
I have heard the Ld. counsel for the parties and have gone
through the case file carefully.
5.
It is a settled law that in order to succeed in claim of interim
injunction applicant should have a legal right and other party should be
under legal obligation. It is well settled law that where equal efficacious
remedy is available to applicant no injunction can be granted. If the
respondents are humiliating, harassing or torturing applicant as submitted
in the present case, the applicant can approach the police against
respondents or can file a criminal complaint but no injunction can be
granted against the respondent restraining them humiliating, harassing or
torturing the applicant. Further no injunction can be granted to restrain
the respondents from doing an act which the court can not supervise all
the time. No prima facie case and balance of convenience are made out in
favour of applicant. Therefore, application is dismissed with no order as
to costs being without any merits.
6.
However, these observations of mine shall not affect the
merits of the case.
Announced
these are the orders of judge on
what is its meaning
and next dat is 15 feb 2014.....