Kapil Tiwari (export executive) 05 April 2014
Kumar Doab (FIN) 05 April 2014
Nomination does not override and supersede succession.
The right of legal heir/successors is not done away by nomination.
Nomination is the only hand which shall pass on the rights to legal heir.
>>>If deceased mother was 100% owner of the Flat: The 2 Sons, 2 Daughters being ClassI legal heir shall share the Flat equally amongst themselves.
>>> If the Flat was jointly owned by deceased Mother and Daughter in Law then the share of deceased Mother (50%) shall be equally divided amongst 2 Sons, 2 Daughters being ClassI legal heir of the deceased mother.
There are many threads on similar query that you may find relevant e.g;
https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Flat-nominee-vs-legal-heir-100243.asp#.Uz_-8UeBmXU
>>> If the share in flat was transferred to daughter in law properly and is on record then why should there be any doubt on her ownership.
However consult a local lawyer with copies of all documents on record.
Kapil Tiwari (export executive) 05 April 2014
Dear Mr. Kumar Doab, if the woman paid 100% money for the flat and the daughter-in-law paid zero amount, how does the daughter-in-law become joint holder? Daughter-in-law can be joint holder to carry out day-to-day operations for the old woman (like signing cheques,etc.) but if she has not paid 50% of the money for the flat, how does she become 50% joint holder of the flat/ property legally? Kindly give this a thought. Thanks.
Kumar Doab (FIN) 05 April 2014
It has been suggested that a lawyer may be consulted with copies of all documents on record.
The owner during her/his lifetime can give away her estate in a manner as she/he pleases e.g; by Gift deed...................................
If the arrangement was as only to look after day to day operations, and was not an ownership, then daughter in law is not an owner. The society might have admitted the daughter in law as a member of society to look after the day to day operations.......................................as posted by you.
From various other threads posted by you it is assumed that the Flat in question is at Mumbai.
Apparently you have gone thru Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the commentary in judgement posted in another thread referred above in this thread.
The learned court has precisely clarified that:
--nominee even after the share is transferred by the society does not become owner, as a successor/legal heir would be.
--Section 30 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act does not and can not provides for a special rule of succession altering the rule of succession laid down by the personal law applicable to the person concerned.
You may consult a local lawyer with copies of all documents on record and proceed further under expert guidance of the lawyer that has examined the record and inputs.