sir, when in a partition suit ,when the defendnant repsonds trying to include all self earned properties of plaintiff(son inherited dad's property) as part of the partition, how will the case move forwared. ..Does the onus lies on the plantiff(son) to prove it is a self earned property (of his dad who is no more) even though it is a malfide act of the defendant to drag the case by pulling these properties of the plantiff into the case what if the plantiff (son) has no proof to show that the properties of dad are self acquired. this is for a hindu family
