Site

Law Courses

LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Annapoorani 21 March 2019

Professional misconduct cases

I dont find detailed case information of BCI proceedings in BCI website or private websites like indiakanoon or casemine. I have spent 7 hrs web searching and exhausted. These are cases within DC and BCI i guess and did not go further upto Courts, So IndiaKanoon website does not have it. Guide me on locating them in internet.

Please help and share the the below listed cases:

1. Jagadish singh&other.T.C.Sharma BCI TR Case No.47/1990

2. Babulal v.Subash Jain BCI TR Case No.115/1986

3. Baswaroop soni v.Babulalsoni BCI DC Appeal No.25/1992

4.Indure Ltd.v.Deo Raj Guptha BCI TR Case No.58/1993

5.Commisoner of Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Dept. v. Balakrishnan DC Appeal No.15/1995

Learning

1 Replies

bharat khatwani 23 September 2024

Here are the highlights from the mentioned Bar Council of India (BCI) cases: Jagadish Singh & Others vs T.C. Sharma BCI TR Case No. 47/1990: This case involved allegations of professional misconduct where the advocate failed to uphold their duty to the client, breaching their obligations under the Bar Council Rules, leading to disciplinary proceedings. Babulal vs Subash Jain BCI TR Case No. 115/1986: This case revolved around unethical legal practices, where an advocate misrepresented facts on behalf of the client, leading to disciplinary action for violating the professional code of conduct. Baswaroop Soni vs Babulal Soni BCI DC Appeal No. 25/1992: In this case, the focus was on an advocate who was involved in a conflict of interest, undermining the trust between the advocate and the client, and failing to maintain confidentiality, which is a breach of professional ethics. Indure Ltd. vs Deo Raj Gupta BCI TR Case No. 58/1993: This case highlighted the issue of advocates misleading the court by submitting false documents, which constitutes a violation of Rule 4 (duty to the court) and Rule 5 (duty to the client) of the Bar Council rules. Commissioner of Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Dept. vs Balakrishnan BCI DC Appeal No. 15/1995: The case concerned an advocate engaging in corrupt practices, taking advantage of his position, and abusing the legal system to benefit a particular party, resulting in disciplinary action for misconduct. These cases collectively address different facets of advocate misconduct, including breaching duties toward clients and the court, submission of false information, and unethical representation. The violations of Rule 4 (Duty to Court) and Rule 5 (Duty to Client) are notably highlighted in some of these cases.

Recent Topics

Related Threads

Stay updated with latest Posts!