LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     27 December 2009

Punishing Hindus under two heads Unconstitutional

Punishing Hindus for contravention of sub clause (iii) of section 5 under section 18 of the Hindu Marriage Act and the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929 is a clear violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. As Hindu Marriage Act of 1954 is applicable only to Hindus, so others ca be prosecuted only under section 5 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929 but the Hindus can be punished under both heads for one set of same facts.Is it not unconstitutional?



 9 Replies

Adv. Deepak (Advocate)     27 December 2009

Resp. Mr. N.K. Assumi,  The two remedies are operating under different statutes, in different set of situations and cognizable in different situations.  Under Hindu Marriage Act, if the marriage is performed in contravention of S.5(iii), it is not void ab initio, but is voidable at the instance of either party, if the party claims that consent of that party is obtained by fraud or coercion in respect of material fact of the respondent.  Hence, the offence is cognizable at the hands of the other spouse.  On the contrary, if the parties are minor and marrying on their free will, may be under misunderstanding or fraud as far as age is concerned, a third party can inform the police and it being a cognizable offence under Child Marriage Restraint Act, police can take cognizance in such case.  If there is no case under Child Marriage Restraint Act, then, there may be case under Hindu Marriage Act at the instance of the either spouse.  However, if there is a case under Child Marriage Restraint Act, making any further case under Hindu Marriage Act does not arise.  Though the remedies appear to be one and the same, they operate under different set of situations.

MOHANA SUNDARAM (Advocate High court Madras. M-9840908555)     27 December 2009

very clear reply from deepak sir

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     27 December 2009

Third party can not question the marriage.I just want to know whether Hindus can be punished under bothh acts, simple, so just answerd it without beating about the bush.,

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     27 December 2009

For your kind imnformtion, contravention of sub clause  (iii) of section 5 is neither void nor voidable but falls under section 18 the penal section. So where are the Hindus in this areas?

RAJ KISHORE VAISH (TEACHER CITIZEN OF INDIA)     27 December 2009

GOOD REPLY  FROM DEEPAK SIR

anand (legal advisor)     27 December 2009

can be prosecuted under both but punishment will not eceed n will be punished under one which have higher punishment if they have unequal penal punishment.

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     28 December 2009

Contravention of sub clause (iii) of section 5 does not falls under section 11 or 12 of the HMA that speak about void and voidable marriage: and is punishable under section 18 of the HMA and if they are punished with further penal sections under the Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929 hindus will suffered more than other non hindus. This is unconstitutional.

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     31 December 2009

To,

Adv. Mr. N k Assume,

Under The Hindu Marriage Act Sec. 18 . Punishment for contravention of section 5, subclause (iii), is

“with simple imprisonment which may extend to fifteen days, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both”

Under The Child Marriage Restraint act, 1929 punishment is "simple imprisonment which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both” moreover the offence is cognizable under C.R.P.C.

Yes Mr. Assume, you are right as because a minor Hindu is governed by both the set of laws, whereas, a non Hindu governed only by the Child Marriage Restraint act, 1929.

There is a scope of argument, as because under Art 14. of The Constitution of India, The State is denying to the effected person equality before the law and the equal protection of the laws. & under Art.15 of The Constitution of India, The State discriminating against the citizen on grounds only of religion.

However, as the two sets of law is there for a particular offence, therefore there is a scope to appeal that the convicted person may be punished which is softer one.

In that case, a Hindu will be benefited in the sense that Sec 18 of The Hindu Marriage Act provides fifteen days simple imprisonment whereas The Child Marriage Restraint act provides simple imprisonment of thirty days.

Wish you a happy ‘New Year’ – 2010.

 

Arup Kumar Gupta, Korba, Chattishgarh ((m)9893058429)     31 December 2009

I am sorry Adv. assumi,

Please read assumi instead of Asseme

Thanks.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register