In Section 353 of IPC case instead of giving Surety /gurantee by a person or if Rs.10000/ surety given is sufficient or will be court insist for surely by a person? Bail earlier given based on a person/s surety which was subsequently cancelled and Rs.10000/- surety is given during last hearing. If the accused is unable to give surely by a person during next hearing whetehr Rs.10000/ surety given is sufficient or court will insist for another person surety. What are the consequences? How to deal with this matter and the accused has now person to give surety now and hence given Rs.10000/- surety. How to proceed in the matter for convincing Magistrate to accept Rs.10000/- surety instead of personal surety. Is this at all possible. Learned members may give advices based on their practical experiences.
Are there instances wherein , in Section 353 only fines were imposed instead of imprisonment… as section says with fine or imprisonment or with both. Pls adv.
S.S.NARAYANAN