LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Kareena Joshi   12 December 2020

question

what is explain the section-6

of IPC


Learning

 2 Replies

175B083 Mahesh P S   12 December 2020

Hello,

Section 6 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned with defining the exceptions, Breaking down its explanation it can be understood that  every definition that defines the meaning, nature, scope of that offence, every that provision as mentioned that aims to penalise the person for the wrongful act committed by him and every illustration defining the offence with the help of examples shall be understood as exceptions as they are mentioned in the chapter “General Exceptions”. One of the objectives of this section is to widen the purview of other sections of the code through illustrations.

 

Thank you

Dr J C Vashista (Advocate)     13 December 2020

Have you become incapaciated to read provisions of Section 6 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or giving an examination ?

It is reproduced here under for your knowledge if it is not an exam, which I can not take.

Chapter II – General Explanations

Section 6:- Definitions in the Code to be understood subject to exceptions

Throughout this Code every definition of an offence, every penal provision and every illustration of every such definition or penal provision, shall be understood subject to the exceptions contained in the Chapter entitled “General Exceptions”, though those exceptions are not repeated in such definition, penal provision, or illustration.

Illustrations

  1. The sections, in this Code, which contain definitions of offences, do not express that a child under seven years of age cannot commit such offences; but the definitions are to be understood subject to the general exception which provides that nothing shall be an offence which done by child under seven years of age.
  2. A, a police-officer, without warrant, apprehends Z who has committed murder. Here A is not guilty of the offence of wrongful confinement; for he was bound by law to apprehend Z, and therefore the case falls within the general exception which provides that “nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is bound by law to do it”.
  •  

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register