Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


(Guest)

Raj hc puts breaks on quick arya samaj marriages

Raj HC puts breaks on quick Arya Samaj marriages

 

Quick Arya Samaj marriages which come in handy for lovers in a hurry will have to undergo changes following a Rajasthan high court directive.

A division bench of the court has placed a ban on any such love marriage unless parents of both the bride and bridegroom are informed through police about the intention of their children to enter into wedlock.

 

A bench comprising justices Dalip Singh and Sajjan Singh Kothari also ruled that no love marriage through Arya Samaj will be allowed to be solemnised unless it has been approved and recommended by two distinguished person of both the sides.

 

It has been made compulsory that both the boy and girl produce three prominent persons as witness of the marriage from either side at Arya Samaj if their parents object to the marriage.


The court directed that in case Arya Samaj authorities decide to go ahead with the ceremony despite objections of the parents, they will have to separately record the reasons for entering into such a mariage.


Expressing displeasure over the manner in which such marriages are being conducted by the Arya Samaj in Rajasthan, the court said, "The pious purpose of the Arya Samaj mission has been lost sight at by local units in the state and they are becoming tool for passification of 'greed and lust' for girl and boy and once it is over the marriage lands in courts resulting in irreversible breakdowns".

In its order, the court directed that at least six days time must be given to the parents of both side to take a conscious decision on such a love marriage.

"It takes them one hour to solemnise a marriage between a 18-year-old girl and a 38 or 40-year-old man which leaves scars forever in the life of parents who bring up their children with great passion and aspirations.Such marriages in lust and greed by young blood cannot be said to be correct.


"We cannot allow society to suffer due to outcome of such a bad marriage. Such marriages are giving a bad message to society and need to be checked immediately," observed Justice Kothari.


The bench passed this order on a Habeas Corpus petition filed by 34-year-old Buddha Ram Meena who entered into such a marriage with 18-year-old Maina Bhatt. When the parents of girl came to know about the marriage, they took her away forcing Buddha to file a Habeas Corpus petition.

From;https://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Jaipur/Raj-HC-puts-breaks-on-quick-Arya-Samaj-marriages/Article1-760596.aspx



Learning

 6 Replies

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     24 October 2011

1. In a way it is pragmatic decision of the DB to protect about age females marrying in a hurry for whatever reasons with older men's and then probably left out on the run.


However it is my view that when two people donot take permission from a Court to get married then Court should get away from legal dissolving a marriage too. By this news quoted stricture Court is indirectly bringing Arya Samaj Mandir Marriages into Special Marriage Act where 30 days notice etal are procedure of a marriage is it not so (sort of backdoor entry to get consensus on Uniform Civil Code...whatever) ?.


But, yes I will go by the decision as reported by you which is based on one set of societal emerging trend of modern
India coming to notice of ld. Court.


[1. Well it would be interesting to now read Sangh Parivars voice on such judicial reforms.
2. It will raise eyebrows if I add why Hindus are being tolerant to such Court intervened pragmatism why not Muslim Marriage Laws modified accordingly and as such Hyderabad areas and Guajarat's muslim dominated areas leads in about age female marriages to wealthy Arabs / Muslims NRI’s is one long term question if I may put across the Board for dicussion!!!]

Adv. Chandrasekhar (Advocate)     24 October 2011

Whether courts, except S.C. under Article 142,  have got power to make laws and especially inject provisions in laws enacted by Parliament?  Once, the parliament enacted Arya Samaj marriage Validation Act, can court put some more conditions to make a marriaged cermonized under the Act to be valid.

Justice Ravindra Bhat of  Delhi High court in 2009 passed an order holding that seding notice of marriage to parents of the bride and bride groom proposed to marry under Special Marriage Act defeats the very object of the Act.  Hence, he struck down that rule in SMA.

We have got a very backward mindset.  We do not believe that a boy of 21 years and girl of 18 years are major and they are competent enough to take decisions of their life, which have far reaching consequences.  We also are not confident ourselves that we cannot convince our own children about their decisions, if we think that their decisions are harmful for them in long time, but they think they are good for them for now and forever.  The experience shows that parental decisions are always not good, with whatever good intentions they take them.  The number of divorces in arranged marriages is one such example. 

After sixty years of independence, you talk with any one- every one says that he doesnot believe in religion, caste and creed.  But, strangely, always the arranged marriages happen only in the same castes and we do not see a brahmin boy is going for sc girl, except in love marriages.  Same is the thing with religion.  Except in love marriages, we do not see inter-religious marriages.

If parents are so progressive, then our  indian society must have got rid of casteism and dowry system.

My final coments are the parents have to behave just like friends to the younger generation and guide them but not thrust their ideas on younger generation.  Othewise, the country will go backward. 

JP (PM)     25 October 2011

will it also affect marriages done 6 months back ?

JP (PM)     25 October 2011

 

is there any method for cancellation of arya samaj marriage except divorce ? or is there any loopholes in this arya samaj marriage which can be made as base for its annulment . The reason is the girl is having affair with somebody else now and at the same time not giving divorce to the aggreived person .


Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA)     25 October 2011

Good Judgement,

 

It doesnot affect marriages performed earlier.

 

 

Regards,



Shonee Kapoor

harassed.by.498a@gmail.com

Sanjeev Kuchhal (Publishers)     10 November 2011

Please provide me with the Full Text of the said Judgment of Rajasthan High Court

 

Thanks in anticipation


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading