Recorded conversations / transcripts of messages - divorce

you make an objection in the court that she had not recorded full conversation , she had recorded only that portion which she can use against me , she had done the recording with malafide intention towards me she had deleated that recording in which she was abetting me to speak harsh with her , intention is to record it for an evidence in the court cases , in general i had never speak any harsh word to her , now you also start recording her conversation, emails , sms, vulgar chats , and other proofs for your counter .

@ Sridhar,

Please find the below link it may help you

 

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=105430&offset=1

Regards,

Shankar.

Dear All , 

           Thanks for ur kind and valuable response. it is helpful for me .

1. You submit that what have been recorded are your angry reactions to her abuses,

 

2. Close scrutiny of all those recordings will reveal that those have been recorded selectively,

 

3. Engage a local lawyer having expertise in the field.

Engaage and consult  a local lawyer

The recorded version has to be proved by her stating that it was indeed your voice and the original transcripttions are to be referred to experts' opinion to confirm her allegation.  Thus, you maintain that you never uttered any of those contents allegedly reported by her to be your voice signifying your cruel acts and intentions.  Despite advancement in technologies, such things are to be proved beyond doubt, you fight it back engaging a smart lawyer who can defend you tooth and nail. Further there is no provision for an individual to get the recorded calls of conversations from a service provider, don't waste time and energy on such stupid ideas, even if you somehow get it, it will lose its validity due to various reasons, instead better concentrate in your case alone.

Thanks a lot to everybody who replied back and suggested me .

I would agree with Mr Laxmi Kant Joshi and Mr K K Ganguly but not with the suggestion given by Mr Kalaiselvan.

Reason being that judges are also human being like you and me and although they may be bound by the rule of letting the recording be proven beyond doubt / atleast rely on expert opinion, clever judges (most of them are) know whose voice is present and straightaway denial by  you may lead to adverse inference against you. Anyways the truth is that recordings were done under provocation and let the same be known to the judge.