Thanks Mr. Ramachary and Mr. Ashok.
A1 works in Place P1
A2, A3 are old and there is a very old person at home with them who has to be taken care.
Complainant tried to file case in some other place P2 initially and the police station people denied stating that the whole set of incidents happened in Place P1.
Later complainant filed a case at her home town and just to make the case come under her home jurisdiction, she made up a big story that some incident has happened at her place. We don't have proof that it did not happen neither they would not be having any proof that it happened, since the incident never actually happened. its just a oral statement as of now she is giving.
I have read articles that supreme court is in favor of women when it comes to transfer of cases from one state to other, but.. i just want to try it under the grounds given below.
1) A1 working in P1
2) A2 A3 can not leave home together for one whole day since there is a old women and she needs some one at home. she is bed ridden. if a case is transferred to P1, the old women can be left at relatives place when ever there are court hearings.
3) Her home town, they have influence and can manipulate people. <not sure if this can be used as a point>
4) The court is in a small town and the case, since its related to women is being dealt partially and already behaving as if the accused is convicted even before the trial. bail pleas of a2 and a3 were turned down even though police gave clean chit to them. <not sure if this could be a valid reason or can this be argued in court>
Thanks,