The legal notice is drafted by your lawyer that has seen your documents on record, has analyzed the inputs given by you, and the merits in your case.
Likewise the reply issued by company thru its lawyer/counsel is based on facts/docs tproduced by company.
Your lawyer can advice you the best.
The reply of the company is in response to the legal notice issued by your lawyer.
The legal notice and reply to legal notice are now case documents on record.
This forum is for discussion and the heartfelt observation on your post shall not replace or amend the observations of your able lawyer.
The legal notice issued by your lawyer has succeeded to work in your favor and it is felt that company has erred by placing on record some statements which apparently is indicative of an adamant and recalcitrant mindset.
Point number 4 in your post):
It is believed that the company does not have its Private Trust to manage the PF. If it has you may download the PF rules.
Otherwise :
PF (amounts standing to the credit of any member in the PF fund) can not be assigned, charged or attached under any decree or order of court.
{(Section 10): THE EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUND AND MP ACT, 1952}
Refusal to attest PF forms is offence.
The statement of the company is refusal in writing. The HR/Line managers/Employer has notions that company has some kind of lien on Employer’s contribution to PF a/c of the employee…………………………
Apparently your lawyer has extracted a statement from your company based on which you can lodge a complaint to RPFC where you’re a/c is managed…………….
Point number 1 in your post):
Relieving letter signifies that nothing is due at the end of the employee and the employee has been properly relieved.
If you have acknowledgment/receipt of having handed over the charge/company property then it shall further augment your claim, that you have completed the exit formalities and have handed over the charge.
Do you mean that upon receiving legal notice now company is claiming that the relieving letter issued by a responsible official in the company is not true?
Point number 2 in your post):
You have already stated that the charge leveled by company after issuance of completion of all exit formalities and thereafter relieving letter is false………………………
Point number 3 in your post):
The email proof is a case document on record.
The officials of the company were not sitting in the amusement park while they issued demand of payment of an amount in Indian Rupees………………………….
And now they come back in the office and have declined their own statement.
The cost of legal notice and damage demanded by your lawyer seems to be justified.
Point number 5 in your post):
Service condition are stated in the certified standing orders (CSO) of the company, appointment letter issued by it……………………………….Notice period/pay is part of service conditions and is stated in CSO, appointment letter ……………………
Any change in service conditions have to be notified to the employee in time and have to be accepted by employee……………………
If addition of notice period in service conditions was not communicated to you and was not accepted by you, you have a reason to agitate……………….
If company has its CSO extended to your designation and notice period stated in CSO is NIL it can not be 1 month in appointment letter…………………….The service conditions stated in CSO can not be negated to employee in appointment letter.
This post is a heartfelt opinion only.
Let your lawyer’s opinion be final on the matter.