Dr. Neera Bharihoke,
Media and judiciary represent the prevalent norm of the society and they ought to work for the maximum welfare of the maximum citizens by dissimation of information in its most objective manner. But it is important to point out that there are inherent faults whether it is of system, lack of norms, unprofessionalism etc. Every body wants world to come after them and no body is willing or aggreable to be part of something right. Cohesiveness amongst the Media and Judiciary is another issue. One upmanship is from what judiciary should abstain and Media should regulate its urge to jump the gun by indulging in the act of sensationalism. Both of them represent the prevalent society and as the society progresses so does the changes in these limbs of Democracy.
For record sake judicial activism started with the widening of Writ Jurisdiction of the Courts when within the parameters of Directive principles of state the Courts with a view to enlarge the scope of public welfare and issues concerning public at large took upon itself the responsibility of cleansing the system be it Pollution matter or Demolition spree by MCD in Delhi. By the way thanks for initiating this discussion.
Best regards
Daksh