RTI to LIC disciplinary rules

Your post to gather information and docs from a premier institution, which is also termed as one of the most transparent, posted in the forum is interactive in nature. 

Kindly update:

1. In LIC also is any time period is fixed for memorial, to start and to conclude.

How the companies or you have arrived at a reasonable time of six months. Is it stated in any of the rules that reasonable time is fixed as six months (for proceedings to start or to conclude).

A clear answer to this is imp. for your case also.

2. Likewise for sanction of leave.

In case leave is rejected then with in how much time the letter/inter office memo is to be supplied to the applicant. In case of rejection the letter/inter office memo to be supplied to the applicant is to be necessarily acknowledged by the applicant or not, and thus just a copy of the letter/inter office memo or acknowledged copy is to be maintained in record.

6. You had mentioned in your posts that no page number was assigned to matter placed on intranet, and later while your complaint was in progress, insertions were made apparently to cover and mask the wrongdoings.

It is believed that circulation of a hard copy of the policies is must.

Your queries are specific.

While it is universal wisdom that sense should prevail. It is noted from your posts that sense has not prevailed. The offenders have grouped, and seem to be adamant, and there is no order from top to offenders to stand and plead guilty.

dear rti activist if you could get reply then u say lic admin is transferent.more in nos cases are pending there in mumbai

It is noted from your posts that the offenders from your company called you and asked you to stop raising RTI applications, or..............

They submitted that the Ex- employee is a serial RTI petitioner, and his RTI applications be dismissed.

Lots of facts, are now out in the open, and prove that the offenders abused the power granted to the position and chair.

It is clear like writing on the wall that habitual bribe takers, offenders have flourished in the company in connivance with each other, and even the chairman does not want to disturb them. But  Why???????????

PM has not asked for the facts and has not acted on the facts. Why?????????????

Your case is not limited to reinstatement, with full benefits and back wages, alone. 

It calls for exemplary punishment to offenders.

1. Reply is not clear since LIC has not inserted " beyond the reasonable period of six months ".

4 & 5 are clear "mistake/typographical error pertains to the Circular issued by us then the wording in the notification issued by the Govt. of India will prevail."

6. is exactly what was asked for. Ramadoss and his staff including GM (P), Krishna, owe an explanation. They can start preparing one, which suits them. Time shall prove how much it shall suit them.

Kindly obtain the copies, consent to which has been given by LIC.

Needless to mention, LIC is straight forward, clear.

Skeletons have started rolling out of cupboards.

Have you received any more calls to stop RTI applications…………..

inspite clear instruction from cic on vedio confrerence,lic still not willing to supply document relied upon to prove charges.lic is only one public orgainisation fully owned by govt.who tkae vert light of rti act.lic isat best to save criminals who are intheir good books oterewise not.lic is yet to gearup in general admin.capacity.capio/cpio/aa all for sake of rti purpose only complience of act not in letter and sprit

ratnam

mumbai