Section 468 crpc in dv act

RAISE THE ISSUE OF Limitation before the trial court..I raise it before the HC and SCI by citing Inderkumar Grewal case but it was summarily dismmissed..

@yogesh.....you objection was dismissed or her DV got dismissed?

No In inder kumar grewal case section of 468 Crpc was raised for quashing of the summoning order passed by the Ld MAGISTRATE and relief was granted to the party..I too raise the same issue before the HC on the grounds of Limitation which was dismiised and the SLP was also dismiised before the SCI for quashing of the summoning order..despite of aapplying the principles of the case

@Yogesh... I am surprised. Can you provide some citations on your case or the case number of the SLP opinion of the SC? I used to participate actively in this forum but do visit occasionally. 

The reason I say so is because the SC cannot change the law. The circumstances/facts  of your case must be different. They may have dismissed your application on some other grounds.

The main issue in this thread is limitation u/s 468 of CRPC.

Please explain in detail for benefit of all that what is the maximum punishment ifn DV ACT and so how this section is bar after 23 months.

Though i am all ready to  use this provision and argue in court , my Ld advocate is not ready for same and not giving proper reason of denial.

This may be new for him too.

The provisions of DV ACT and crpc 125 are over lapping and  it is essential to have them examined by higher courts.

Petition u/s 395 in lower court or writ in higher courts is solution.

Those who are  facing more hardships due to such multiple cases are welcome to join.

Samir..I do agree

But yoiu have to believe me what I have said I filed theLP before the supreme court of India and in the listing profrma I specifically mentioned the case of Inder kUmar Grewal Vs Stte of Punjab citation as similar case disposed of

But during the course of hearing, "the Hon'ble bench Burst on me they stated saying that Justcic chauhan has pronounced the order and the contenst are quite differnt and where its mentioned about the limitation..Its was differnt case purely that divorce has tken place by fraud"

My SLP was summarily dismissed

Samir..I do agree

But yoiu have to believe me what I have said I filed theLP before the supreme court of India and in the listing profrma I specifically mentioned the case of Inder kUmar Grewal Vs Stte of Punjab citation as similar case disposed of

But during the course of hearing, "the Hon'ble bench Burst on me they stated saying that Justcic chauhan has pronounced the order and the contenst are quite differnt and where its mentioned about the limitation..Its was differnt case purely that divorce has tken place by fraud"

My SLP was summarily dismissed

Samir..I do agree

But yoiu have to believe me what I have said I filed theLP before the supreme court of India and in the listing profrma I specifically mentioned the case of Inder kUmar Grewal Vs Stte of Punjab citation as similar case disposed of

But during the course of hearing, "the Hon'ble bench Burst on me they stated saying that Justcic chauhan has pronounced the order and the contenst are quite differnt and where its mentioned about the limitation..Its was differnt case purely that divorce has tken place by fraud"

My SLP was summarily dismissed

In my case, my wife deserted me in June 2016 (Left Mumbai). In Sept 2016, she filed CrPc 125 (in Ahmedabad). She got uset with interim judgement. Later in May 2018, she filed DV against my entire family (after 22 months of seperation).