Hi There,
I need some suggestion on following.
I am consiering one property for purchase in Bangalore , its a private layout.
land was DC converted in 1982,
Mr. 'A' purchased it in 1960 ,
Mr 'A' sold it to person 'B' 'C'and person 'D'
person 'B' , person 'C' and person 'D' had some partnership firm
which formed this layout by approval of gram panchayat and sold it to various people including person 'E'
person 'E' holds more than one residential plots with 'A' khata.
Now its under BBMP limits.
Now person A's son, has filed a partition case in COURT OF THE CIVIL JudGE(JR.DVN)
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.
As far I understand, Mr. 'A' had purchased it himself in 1960
so its not ansestral property, so his son should be able to claim.
in year 2004, A-son filed a parition suite claiming that his father
had purhcased this property from his grand father's money i.e. A-father's money.
A-son claimed that 'A' was not educated, A was taking care of
milk selling business that was owned by his grand father.
A-son also claims that B,C &D hired tantrik to convince A
( well that sounded very funny in course case :)
A-son had filed this case against A,B,C &D and
now he has propsed to include almost 113 people
living in layout as DEFENDENT.
but i hear that all people in layput have hired on lawyer and they
have declined to become "DEFENDENT".
what is your opinion sir?
If sale of 1960 in which Mr 'A' is purchaser,
If he dint mentioned the source of income to buy this property ?
Is it ok to buy ?
If 1960 sale deed mentions the source of income as the money earned
from family business, then should we stay away from this?
We in process of getting the certified extrace of sale deed of year
1960.
