yogesh
(will tell you later)
20 July 2015
Sir,
The Judge has wrongly consider that marriage took place at Infdore while FIR/Chargehseet clearly states that marraige held at New Delhi and hence he dismissed the Revision petition on charges framed under 498-A, 406,323,506 IPC. The operative part of Judgment is as follows:
"14. So far as the territorial jurisdiction to try the case for the
alleged offences is concerned; marriage of the revisionist/accused no.1
and the complainant's daughter was solemnised at Indore. The dowry
articles were also entrusted to the which
the accused have now misappropriated.
Thus, the part of offence has
been committed in the territorial jurisdiction of Indore. Therefore, the
courts at Indore have got territorial jurisdiction to try and entertain the
present case. Moreover, the transfer application of the revisionists/
accused has already been dismissed by the Hon'ble Apex Court vide
order dated
15. I have gone through the authorities referred to by learned
counsel for the revisionists/accused in cases Y.Abraham Ajith and
others, Manish Ratan and others, Bhura Ram and others,
Satvinder Kaur, Sajjan Kumar and Savitri Devi cases (supra). There
is no dispute with regard to the law laid down in the said authorities,
but the same are of no help to the revisionists/accused."
Now I am seekin advice whether operative part of Judmnet can be corrected?