Time Barred

Arpan

Even if you have evidences (which obviously u and ur advocate only know), let me ask a very simple question. You claim that the shares were stolen, in that case what action was initiated at your end, (1) did you file a police complaint about the missing share certificates and receive a FIR (2) did you intimate the company about the loss along with the copy of the FIR.  (3) what were the reasons to file a case after 4 yrs.

The replies from you can only lead us to answer your query

Dear Sir,

1> I filed an FIR & recieved a copy.2> Tata Company was intimated about the loss.3> Reasons for filing case after long time are as below. At that time out of the 2590 shares being stolen, Tata Power issued 1490 duplicate shares to me as there were no claimant to these 1490 shares. The rest 1100 shares were not issued because of stay from Nagarjuna. The value of the 1100 shares at that time was low so it did not appeal me to file a suit & thus bear further litigation costs. Subsequently I approached various Investor Protection Groups, SEBI etc & also met Tata Power officials. Finally in 2002, I understood the need to file a suit & thus did the same in 2002. Tata Power immediately responded saying it was time barred. Can the judge now apply the time barred arguement in this scenario ?

I have the copy of latest order/judgment from the judge. Kindly study the same & reply. This outcome of the case is really causing a lot of anxiety & disturbance. Request you to shed some legal opinions on the same.

Thanks