HI Respected Members,
In this i am the complainant. There are few queries for the cheif examination in the case. IPC 326 is registered against the accused.
1. The hammer which is used by the accused to beat complainant in the 1st date of chief examination is changed by the police. My father aged 74 years, wrongly identified the changed hammer put by police. About false hammer i reported to police and public prosecutor. They told let the false hammer be there as evidence. But i will insisted to them that please bring the original hammer as this is the important evidence in my case and i don't know whether fingure print report of the hammer is done by the police or not.
Now my question is does i go with false hammer or insist in the court that it is false hammer and bring the original hammer. My this decision can impact the case ...? as my father who is the complainant of the case identified the false hammer as the original hammer in the chief examination. Note - i am the co - complainant in the case.