Good morning!!
Question No1.
How the judge/family court judge/magistrate record the cross exam Qs and As, in India (in civil suits/family courts/criminal trials )?
is there specified format? are Judges duty bound to capture Qs in exactly the same wordings as factually asked during cross ............. and also the answers?
I have a query as to transcriptt /recording of cross exam by judge in divorce suit vide family court act and HMA 1955.
Is it a Q and A format?
E.g. Is it like question posed "as it is" and answer given "as it is" in yes , no, don't recall/know etc etc etc? or some other way like 'It is tru to say that ...it is not true to say that ...wherein question isn't written and only answer is recorded.
It is a divorce case.
we are supposed to take cross of unscrupulous spouse. Do you have any sample as to how family court judge records a cross exam.
Is it like question posed as it is and answer? or some other way?
Family court act says evidence may be written in a consice format!!!
Question No2.
If petitioner in its pleading and in testimony has levelled bald allegations again and again in many paragraphs but using different wording like .............. always, .......... never, .... always insisted, ............
and like
'Respondent insulted me .... respondent shouted at me .......... repondent misbehaved with me ................. respondent did not took care of my needs ............ iggnored me .... taunted me ridiculed me very much .......... caused grave agony to me ......... I got rude shock by behaviour of respondent .................... (there are around 104 line just like this but unsubstnatiated by any relevant probative incidents etc.)
My question is:
IS it necessary to to confront /put suggestion for each and every and repetitive such bald and vague allegations? ......
If respondent fails to put sugestions/doubt/put words in the mouth of petitioner in the cross of petitioner to above ach and every and repetitive vague allegations but manages to to do so in a few such allegations in repetitive manner .............. Would it still result into adverse implication to respondent?
please guide me on this if you can.
Best regards.
Damayanti.