Violation of hon,ble high court order by administration

Dr.Chandran Peechulli

Chief Consultants
[ Scorecard : 65] [edit]
[edit photo]

MANY LEGAL LUMINAIRRES HAD SAID you will get justice from High Courts but the Karnataka High Court Judge is also biased if not corrupt, which duty conscious vigilance can prove. Ref:RSA160/2011.  “A TRUTHFUL CRITICISM OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC GOOD WAS SO VITAL, FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF DEMOCRACY and THE TRUTH WAS THE DEFENCE IN THIS CASE.” *Sir, the entire process is vitiated by arbitrariness and non-compliance with guidelines. Advocate when engaged should view the client’s interest but for colluding with the opposite advocate, with a wrong motive, having experienced a cheque bounce case. Further, the jury in the honourable lower courts do object to our ‘expressing our grievances’ but for permitting the counsel alone to speak. If when asked, advocate replies that the clients keep coming and going but he has to remain with his advocate. Imperative need for the attitudinal changes amongst the advocates to instil real justice and divinity of courts, to keep the Judiciary high in the minds of the common people. Colleagues /mates, while in legal practice, in the courts of justice.  As a client I have felt that an advocate handles many clients for his survival, hardly observes 60% of the client’s grievances while handling many clients. When the judiciary is held esteem, the litigant be also allowed to express, if the counsel has missed out important salient features important to the case. Can the Advocates in their professional life, not swear an oath, to be HONEST and work with INTEGRITY, as a part of the Professional Code of Advocate’s Conduct and Ethics?  Particularly, Lawyers in the profession have to attend to many various clients of different walks of life, for whom they are engaged, hence how much does the lawyer remembers, from what is told and how much he remembers of what the client explained, of the suffering aggrieved litigant. Hence, it is imperative that the aggrieved client is given the opportunity to express his real grievances to the Justice.. (Judge) to instil fairness/justice in the court-hall. Case No. also called out in the local language (kannada), in City Civil Court, finding difficult to outsiders of Bangalore, finding difficulty to reach out near the judge in the Court Hall. JUSTICE IN THE AIR. If the almighty god do really exist my curse will shatter the family life and ruin the advocates, judge and the High Court Justice K N KeshavaNarayana who was responsible to give a biased favour and heartless Judgement to an aggrieved  litigant who is travelling from Chennai to Bangalore and back attending Court Hearings from 2004 after running pillar to posts,reporting to Law and Order Authorities.IF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS CONCERNED OF THIS SENIOR CITIZEN AND EX SERVICEMAN IN GIVING JUSTICE SHOULD PROBE CBI INVESTIGATIONS, having several time reported to the highest office of the PRESIDENT OF INDIA for JUSTICE, going unheard but for referring to the Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Govt. of Karnataka,which ends up there itself.

Dr.Chandran Peechulli

Chief Consultants
[ Scorecard : 65] [edit]
[edit photo]

MANY LEGAL LUMINAIRRES HAD SAID you will get justice from High Courts but the Karnataka High Court Judge is also biased if not corrupt, which duty conscious vigilance can prove. Ref:RSA160/2011.  “A TRUTHFUL CRITICISM OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC GOOD WAS SO VITAL, FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF DEMOCRACY and THE TRUTH WAS THE DEFENCE IN THIS CASE.” *Sir, the entire process is vitiated by arbitrariness and non-compliance with guidelines. Advocate when engaged should view the client’s interest but for colluding with the opposite advocate, with a wrong motive, having experienced a cheque bounce case. Further, the jury in the honourable lower courts do object to our ‘expressing our grievances’ but for permitting the counsel alone to speak. If when asked, advocate replies that the clients keep coming and going but he has to remain with his advocate. Imperative need for the attitudinal changes amongst the advocates to instil real justice and divinity of courts, to keep the Judiciary high in the minds of the common people. Colleagues /mates, while in legal practice, in the courts of justice.  As a client I have felt that an advocate handles many clients for his survival, hardly observes 60% of the client’s grievances while handling many clients. When the judiciary is held esteem, the litigant be also allowed to express, if the counsel has missed out important salient features important to the case. Can the Advocates in their professional life, not swear an oath, to be HONEST and work with INTEGRITY, as a part of the Professional Code of Advocate’s Conduct and Ethics?  Particularly, Lawyers in the profession have to attend to many various clients of different walks of life, for whom they are engaged, hence how much does the lawyer remembers, from what is told and how much he remembers of what the client explained, of the suffering aggrieved litigant. Hence, it is imperative that the aggrieved client is given the opportunity to express his real grievances to the Justice.. (Judge) to instil fairness/justice in the court-hall. Case No. also called out in the local language (kannada), in City Civil Court, finding difficult to outsiders of Bangalore, finding difficulty to reach out near the judge in the Court Hall. JUSTICE IN THE AIR. If the almighty god do really exist my curse will shatter the family life and ruin the advocates, judge and the High Court Justice K N KeshavaNarayana who was responsible to give a biased favour and heartless Judgement to an aggrieved  litigant who is travelling from Chennai to Bangalore and back attending Court Hearings from 2004 after running pillar to posts,reporting to Law and Order Authorities.IF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS CONCERNED OF THIS SENIOR CITIZEN AND EX SERVICEMAN IN GIVING JUSTICE SHOULD PROBE CBI INVESTIGATIONS, having several time reported to the highest office of the PRESIDENT OF INDIA for JUSTICE, going unheard but for referring to the Hon’ble Chief Secretary, Govt. of Karnataka,which ends up there itself.