Who To Bring Accused in court u/s138

Besides approaching High Court in writ jurisdiction as advised by Mr. Anurag Bhatt, did you or your lawyer raise objection before the Trial Court regarding intentional absence of accused ? If so,  what is the response of the Court ?

Cons Cheque is a chronic trend in the counry, and 7 years pendency is startling. Don't waste any more time and ask the court to issue warrant against the defaulting payee.  

The Complaint U/S 138 NIA is criminal and warrants are to be issued against the accused, why is your lawyer sleeping .  

as per Sec.70, Crl.P.C. a warrant cannot be issued unless the Court is satisfied that the circumstances necessitate the issue of a warrant of arrest.

It is also noteworthy to note that as per Sec. 143 Negotiable Instruments Act, notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, the offenses are triable summarily in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 21 under  Secs. 262 to 265, Crl.P.C. Yet, (even though it is a summary trial) sentence can be imposed up to one year, and more than Rs.5,000 may be imposed as a fine. (Please Note: Summary trials deal with cases that consist of minor offenses of simple nature as opposed to serious cases which are tried in summons/warrant trials.)

If you are serious and urgent you personally try ,if not it takes another 7 years  no one is interested in cheque bounce case only complainant has to be serious to recover money .we can only defend in court .