Wife needs advice on delicate matter

When there is high court order, noting can be done and touched.

Magistrate can lose his job.

There will be case on wife of chori dacoity.

There will be case on police too.

Wife will go to jail if she bribes police and enters the house.

Better to fall at feet of husaband and or mother in law and ask forgiveness and ask return of stridhan and sign divorce papers.

It is shameful that Indian household stories have gone this bad, where police enter private life.

Third class people all in laa.

Now if forcibly the wife stays in the house, nobody can be blamed bu t the wife, if she iss killed or poisoned or hanged.  Matter is too riskhy.

After doing so much hulabaloo it is shameful for any decent woman to even think of entering the husbands house.

Legally all optoins are over.

Any step further, wife and co will go to jail for harassing senior citizens.

Originally posted by : Tarachand

Sirji,     Magistrate  granted  Ex-Party Order  directing  Husband  and  his  Parents  to allow Wife to enter in shared household and stay there      Now What we want :- Can  Wife  approach  Police  and  hand-over  keys  with  condition  that  the Locks of shared  house  must  be opened  in front of her so that she can take out her streedhan And when the House is opened then she has to enter in the house to take her streedhan

  Both the above mention lines are contradictory.

Court only ordered to reside in house. How does question of stridhan arises

Query is not clear to me also.

Mental case:

First ask for residence orders. Then inhabitants run away locking the house.  Wife goes and puts her own lock so that inhabitants of house wont get inside their own house or that she will come to know that they came back to the house? The inhabitants go for appeal and succeed. Now wife wants to get inside the house, but court has ordered not to touch the inhabitants or the house. Now wife wants to stay in the house, in all this she has claimed stridhan to be in hands of inhabitants of the house.  Ihabittants dont want her to enter the house in the first place.  Why will they allow her inside the house?

 Shameless people.  Even court will be confused what to do with such mental people.

Originally posted by : Tarachand
	Sirji,     Magistrate  granted  Ex-Party Order  directing  Husband  and  his  Parents  to allow Wife to enter in shared household and stay there   But they  put Lock on the shared house and ran away. So Wife also put her Lock on shared house and mentioned and also informed to Police that she is ready to give key but Locks of shared house must be opened in her front so that she can take out her Streedhan and valuables out of it also informed this fact to Magistrate in pending case   They  (Husband and  his  Parents)  filed  application u/s. 482 of Cr. P.C. in High Court against the Ex-Party Order but High Court has Not granted Stay   After 06 months the Father of Husband filed an application in pending case  that his medicines are lying in the said Shared House Hold  but wife had put lock on shared house and he was suffering. On basis of such statement the High Court passed Order that   “No conceive actions be taken against the Respondents to implement the aforesaid Ex-Party Order” and disposed Application u/s. 482 of Cr. P.C. filed by them and sent the case to directed District Court where already Appeal u/s. 29 filed by them (Husband  and  his  Parents ) is pending   Recently they  (Husband  and  his  Parents)   filed Police Complaint  against Wife  for putting Locks on the Shared  House  because  they cannot take Medicines out of it.   Now What we want :- Can  Wife  approach  Police  and  hand-over  keys  with  condition  that  the Locks of shared  house  must  be opened  in front of her so that she can take out her streedhan And when the House is opened then she has to enter in the house to take her streedhan  And once she enters in the shared house then she will stay there only in pursuance of the Ex-Party Order passed by the Magistrate   Because High Court directed not to take coercive actions against them to implement the said Ex-Party-Order  BUT  when they (Respondents) themselves are opening the shared house then question of coercive  actions does not arise  And Further  Wife  can  stay inside shared House as per Ex-Party-Order of Magistrate because the High Court has neither stayed execution of said Ex-Party Order  nor stopped the Wife to enter into the said shared House  but simply directed not to take conceive actions against  them  (Husband  and  his  Parents) for implementing  the Ex-Party Order.   Is it Correct Guide Regards  HARIOM

Mental case:

First ask for residence orders. Then inhabitants run away locking the house.  Wife goes and puts her own lock so that inhabitants of house wont get inside their own house or that she will come to know that they came back to the house? The inhabitants go for appeal and succeed. Now wife wants to get inside the house, but court has ordered not to touch the inhabitants or the house. Now wife wants to stay in the house, in all this she has claimed stridhan to be in hands of inhabitants of the house.  Ihabittants dont want her to enter the house in the first place.  Why will they allow her inside the house?

 Shameless people.  Even court will be confused what to do with such mental people.

bolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrrybolo hari om hurry. hari omm harrry

The wife has been in the wrong in putting her own locks on the door; she has virtually taken the Law in her hands. It could be that she has been wrongly advised.