* In a civil writ will the high court take facts into account or not?
* Will it decide merely based on affidavits?
* What if the opponent submits falsities in his written statement?
* What if the opponent does not give me the copy of his reply and submits it directly to court by hand? (He does not file the reply with court registry and gives it directly to court by hand. This helps him bypass the mandatory rule of giving the opponent the copy of the reply. He then submits some falsities, turns to some HIN-GLISH and gets away with the crime that he has perpetrated).
* How to prevent private respondents from answering as official respondents? Individual on whom the writ has been filed is repeatedly interferring with justice as office on whom the case is filed is down delegating the power to this crook and this crook is covering up his mistake by comitting more and more crime.
