Dear Mr. Bimboshty,
Yes, by saying being an Advocate, I attach importance and not in any way trying to belittle any one. What I am saying is once a lead is given - as to what is winding up petition and what is the procedure and also the relevant provisions in the Company law - an Advocate is not again expected to repeat the same basic question. That is what you have done here - by opening a new thread -.
You further go on to say that "Why confuse yourself and make others to confuse? - As an Advocate, let me repeat, you are not clear with your question - if some one has answered on the basis of the question posed, you say one is getting confused and in the process confusing others!
The other particulars about your client's position etc., is now you are revealing. You did not disclose earlier. If only you had given the above facts and posed the question - one would have easily understood that your question itself is wrong. When these relevant facts are not revealed, how can you say that you have not hidden these facts.
You ask a question, Is it so guarantee that an advocate must know every basic? - Agreed, every one cannot know every basic - the law is a vast ocean and every day one has to learn - even the greatest legal luminaries never claimed that they know everything. But an Advocate must know the basic at least as to how to put a Question. This itself you have not done. That is a pity.
You say that there are so many Advocates who do not know the basics. So what, I do not want to be one of them. If you want, so you be.
I do not mind whether you mind my words or not. But once in the Forum, I will express clearly what exactly I want to say (and I will have sound basis for what I have said.)