Held, the Plaintiffs' right to ownership of the land has ceased by virtue of the lease which subsists. No Court can grant relief to a party who, by virtue of his own agreement, is not shown to be in possession of the premises after the contract is determined. Granting relief of protecting the possession of the Plaintiffs, who are not in juridical possession at all and mere occupants as contractor under a contract which has come to an end upon the termination of the contract by efflux of time, would mean and constitute that the Court supplants a contract between the parties by a contract made by itself, which is contrary to the rights and obligations agreed to by the parties. Impugned order therefore, set aside. Appeal from Order allowed.
