Held, principle that in revision the High Court cannot interfere with the findings of fact arrived at by the Controller on re-appreciation of evidence, has been reiterated in numerous cases. The scope of interference in exercise of revisional powers of this Court is very limited. Therefore, the impugned judgment dated 30.10.2009 is in accordance with law. The same does not suffer from any illegality, perversity or any jurisdictional error, which deserves interference by this Court. Therefore, while upholding the impugned judgment. Petition dismissed.
