Held, that this court would not normally interfere with the interim order passed by the learned single Judge in appeal except in compelling circumstances. In the present case it is not disputed that as per the order impugned in the writ petitions the Administrator was appointed and he was directed to hold election to the post of President to the Society on 22.04.2010 and the calender of events is not challenged in the writ petitions and the interim order is passed on the same day. Court held that when calendar of events has been published, this Court would not interfere with the calendar of events and the appropriate order to be passed in such cases would be to permit the elections to be held as per the calendar of events and make the election subject to the result of the writ petition. The Court modified the order of Interim injunction.
