LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Analysis of para 18 & 19 of CPC

Esheta Lunkad ,
  11 September 2020       Share Bookmark

Court :

Brief :
MGG said that BOCL wanted to borrow money from a bank &MGG wanted to be a guarantor on those shares.
Citation :
Petitioner: Messer Holdings Ltd Respondent: Shyam Madanmohan Ruia Citation: 2020 (1) SCC 252

Bench:

J. Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre

Issue:

Whether MGG committed a breach of contract?

Facts:

  • Messer Griesham GmbH(MGG) was a German company.
  • Shareholders of Goyal Gases Ltd (GGL) in India entered into sharepurchase agreement with that German company.
  • MGG took 49% shares of GGL.
  • MGG took another company BOCL's 75k shares, despite GGL's protest.
  • Then, MGG took those shares under the name of MHL, which was its subsidiary.
  • BOCL filed a suit that MGG has nulified the contract.

Appellant's contentions:

MGG said that BOCL wanted to borrow money from a bank &MGG wanted to be a guarantor on those shares.

Respondent's contentions:

GGL wanted MGG to not take BOCL's shares on its own.

Final judgement:

  • The first suit between MGG &GGL is resolved by themselves.
  • And the second suit by BOCL against MGG & GGL, showed that MGG didn’t obtain share certificates from BOCL, but it was given to MHL.
  • Hence, appeal is dismissed.
 

Enroll the Course on CPC by Mr. S.C Virmani:
Click Here

 
"Loved reading this piece by Esheta Lunkad?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"



Published in Others
Views : 560




Comments