The appellant filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Allahabad High Court for a declaration that the decision of the Aligarh Muslim University (‘AMU’ for short), the first respondent herein, to establish special campus centres across India was ill..
The facts have been set out in the impugned judgment and hence we are not repeating the same here except wherever necessary. This is a case of brutal murder of a sex worker. Sex workers are also human beings and no one has a right to assault or mu..
Two Special Leave Petitions, being SLP(C) Nos. 10364 of 2006 and 9739-9740 of 2009, have been filed against the judgment and order dated 19th July, 2005, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi in Revision Petition ..
This Transfer Petition has been filed to transfer case being MACT No. 138 of 2009 pending at the District Judge (MACT Court, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.) to the competent Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The petitioners allege in the petition that the MACT Co..
A short question that arises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is as to whether the appellant has been rightly denied promotion to the post of Ticket Collector (TCR), Group ‘C’ post, on account of his having not been declared medica..
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 5.8.2005 of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in O.J.C. No. 11122/1999, by which the High Court has issued directions to the State Govt. to grant particular pay scales with referen..
Challenge in these appeals, by special leave, is to the judgments and orders dated 28th April, 2009 and 1st July, 2009 delivered by the High Court of Bombay in W.P. No. 707 of 2009, and Criminal Application No. 178 of 2009 in W.P. No. 707 of 2009, re..
This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20.4.2006 rendered by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.16151 of 2003 by which the prayer made by the appellant to quash order dated 12.5.2002 passed by the Punjab & Haryana ..
This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated September 3, 2003 passed by a division bench of the Allahabad High Court on a writ petition (Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.6162 of 2003) filed by the respondent who ..
Sections 498A, 304B, 302 and 302 read with Section 34 IPC and under Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.08.2010 passed in Writ Petition (C)No.7690 of 2004 by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. The short question which arises for consideration is regarding the refund of the amount by the..
According to the petitioner, the Salt Lake City was the result of dream of the late Chief Minister Dr. B.C. Roy of establishing a new township for the lower and middle income groups on the eastern side of Calcutta (now Kolkata) and the land to be use..
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 23rd July 2010 passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka whereby the learned Judges dismissed the W.A. No.1192 of 2007 which was filed impugning an acquisition proceeding to t..
This contempt petition has been filed by the appellants to initiate contempt proceedings against the statutory authorities i.e. District Collector of Mumbai Suburban District for passing the order dated 20.5.2010 appointing the Committee to examine w..
The protection of commons rights of the villagers were so zealously protected that some legislation expressly mentioned that even the vesting of the property with the State did not mean that the common rights of villagers were lost by such vesting. T..
Whether the cut off dates specified in clauses (4) and (5) of Regulation 5 of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition, Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2007 (for short, “the 2007 Regulations”) as amended by Notification F. No.48-3/(1..
The appellants have preferred these two appeals, by special leave, because consequent upon the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, they are likely to lose their job of more than 14 years with the Mahanadi Coalfields Limi..
This Appeal by Special Leave raises the question as to whether the suit of the first appellant for the recovery of her house property filed prior to the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 coming into force could be considered to be prohibite..
This appeal, filed under Section 116A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 (“the Act” for short), is directed against judgment dated August 28, 2007, rendered by the learned Single Judge of the Gauhati High Court in Election Petition No. 4 of 20..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
