..
Facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are that the appellants had been the members of the Modern Co-op. Group Housing Society Ltd. (hereinafter called the ‘Society’) and claimed to have paid all their subscriptions of membership and othe..
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2001 passed in Second Appeal No. 191 of 1991 by the High Court of Bombay by which the Second Appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree of the First Appell..
This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the judgment and order dated 12th July 2002, delivered by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “the National Commission”) in First Appeal No. 354 of 1996, whereby it set asi..
The All Sikkim Youth Forum, a registered body, filed a writ petition in public interest in the High Court. This appeal was based on a news item which was published in the ‘Sikkim Observer’, a National Hill Weekly, from 13th to 17th November, 2000 und..
SLP(C) No. 12788 of 2008 was filed by the petitioners namely Shri Vijendra Kumar Verma and Shri Harendra Kumar Ozha. But so far as Shri H.K. Ozha is concerned, on his behalf a prayer was made to withdraw his name from the petition as he was appointed..
The central question of law arising on the appeal before this Court is whether a notice served with show cause 1 notice under Rule 4(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘..
This appeal is directed against order dated 20.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench of Kerala High Court whereby it allowed the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 and quashed the appointment of the appellant as member of the Kerala State Consumer..
The appellant Man Kaur was the owner of the suit property, a plot admeasuring 1000 sq.yards with the building thereon, identified as ‘Annexe No 508’ situated in Sector-18B, Chandigarh. The respondent-plaintiff was, at all the relevant points of time,..
The appellant-Shyam Telelink Ltd. was granted a licence under the Indian Telecom Act, 1885 on 4th March, 1998 for providing basic telecom services in Rajasthan Circle. A licence agreement was executed between the parties that, inter alia, required th..
The appellant-company holds a licence to provide cellular mobile telephone services for Delhi Metro area. The Licence Agreement executed between the appellant on the one hand and the Government of India on the other, inter alia, provided for payment ..
Being aggrieved by her non-selection, the appellant filed an application (OA No.2406 of 1999) before the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal challenging her non-selection. The appellant contended that the fourth respondent was ineligible for the..
The respondent was commissioned in the Indian Army in the Regiment of Artillery on June 23, 1968 in the rank of Second Lieutenant. After grant of Commission, the seniority of the respondent was re-fixed with effect from August 21, 1969. Thus, for the..
Short facts leading to this appeal are as follows:- At the relevant time in November 1994, the appellant was working as a Chief Law Assistant which was a Group-‘C’ post in the Southern Railways. The post higher to this post is that of the Assistant L..
The arbitrator made an award dated 6.7.1991 allowing claims 1 to 8, 11 and 12 (Note: claims 1,2 and 5 were allowed only in part) and disallowing claims 9, 13 to 20 of the respondent. The arbitrator also granted interest from 10.3.1989 to 6.1.1990 and..
According to the appellant, he is a freedom fighter, who sacrificed his studies in the freedom struggle and had taken active part in the 1942 agitation and was forced to remain an absconder for more than four years i.e. from 20.08.1942 till September..
The respondent was the subscriber of telephone bearing No.40193, in Anand Town installed at the residence of its Managing Director (for convenience we will also refer to the Managing Director as the ‘subscriber’). The bi-monthly bills in regard to th..
We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the prayer of Shri Divan and are of the view that it will in the interest of justice if time is allowed to respondent no.1 - M/s. Golden Chariot Airport till 31st October, 2010 to vacate the site and h..
The relevant facts of the case are that M/s Golden Chariot Airport (hereinafter referred to as “the contesting respondent”) succeeded in a tendering process for running a deluxe grade-I restaurant, covering a space of about 5000 sq. ft., in the car p..
. Bant Kaur, the widow of Lal Singh and Sukhwinder Singh and Paramjit Kaur, his son and daughter respectively filed a suit (No.877 of December 20, 1994) in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Dhuri, claiming a sum of Rs.2,00,000.00 (rupees tw..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
