The appeals against the CESTAT order were dismissed due to time-barred demands, as per Civil Appeal 6033 of 2009. The central issues in Civil Appeal Nos. 6033/2009 and 5714/2011 are being adjudicated by this common order...
The SC decided that by failing to check for passenger boarding before signalling the driver, the appellant acted carelessly and negligently. According to Section 338 of the IPC, the offence carries a sentence of up to two years in prison...
Rule 8(2) of the aforementioned Rules grants the government the authority to make exceptions to the rules in cases where strict adherence would result in undue hardship...
Court considered the fatal injuries suffered by the appellant requiring an attendant and awarded compensation of Rs.10,80,000 towards attendant charges...
The Supreme court considered that the application had been filed on August 2, 2004, and as a result, it did not find any compelling reasons to excuse the delay in filing the application...
The agreement was amended twice. First was related to changes in the rates of commission while the second one dated 01.01.2008 declared the first amendment as null and void...
While ruling on a most significant legal point pertaining directly to the maintenance of women, the Madras High Court in a most robust, rational and remarkable judgment titled S Amalraj Vs State and Another in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15704 of 2018 and Crl.M.P..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
Dying declaration discredited by the High Court on the grounds of bad state of the deceased while making the dying declaration. Thus the conviction and punishment of the accused were set aside. ..
..
..