Publishers And Booksellers Guild And Ors. vs State Of West Bengal And Ors. on 12/1/2007..
Sukanta Ghosh @ Bapi vs State Of West Bengal on 11/1/2007..
Bank Of Baroda vs Govind Ram Agarwal on 11/1/2007..
llegal detention and arrest by police - Death of person arrested in Hospital due to torture by police officers - Compensation for death caused by police - Whether the petitioner's request for payment of compensation can be countenanced by the High Co..
Plea of Bail - Conflicting Jurisdiction - Applicants involved in offences punishable under three different enactments namely Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985..
Limitation - Fraud - Discover of - Respondent filed a securities fraud action, alleging petitioner knowingly misrepresented the heart-attack risks associated with its drug - District Court dismissed complaint being barred by limitation - Third Circu..
Impleadment - suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction - the same was directed against the order dated 4th December, 2004 passed by learned Judge, 10th BENCH, City Civil Court at Calcutta in Title Suit No.815 of 2000 thereby rejecting t..
Consumer dispute - the electricity supply was discontinued without notice. Compensation of Rs.50,000/- was awarded along with 12% interest per annum by the District Forum and upheld by the State Commission. The National Commission took the view that ..
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s. 100; M.P. Land Revenue Code - In 1969, Government issued a notice for ejectment under Section 248 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code (in short 'the Code') claiming the land to be a land of the Government and the appellant..
In this appeal, the short question which arises for our consideration is that Respondent No.3 had filed a complaint under Sections 498-A and 379 of the Indian Penal Code [for short, `I.P.C.']. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submit that n..
Determination of right to mining iron ore, a natural resource, has reached this Court in second round of litigation. Respondent No.1 in both the Special Leave Petitions had challenged the Order of State of Andhra Pradesh issued on 25.11.2009, suspend..
The predecessor-in-interest of respondent no.3 was an unauthorised occupant of a hut/structure in the slum area measuring about 600 sq. ft. Respondent No.3 vide Deed of Assignment dated 15.7.2006 assigned her rights to the respondent no.4. The partne..
Learned senior counsel for the appellants submitted that there should not be any conviction and sentence on disjointed and scrappy evidence. The trial Court as well as the High Court failed to take into account various infirmities that crept into th..
Learned senior counsel for the appellant after taking us through all the relevant materials contended that the High Court has committed an error in upholding the conviction of the appellant when on the same set of evidence the other accused were acqu..
. The relevant facts very briefly are that on 28.07.1983 the Government of India sent a Circular to all the State Governments to depute the Forest Range Officers who have passed the Forest Ranger Course with honours for admission to two year course a..
The relevant facts very briefly are that the respondents herein were working in the post of Investigators in the National Sample Survey Organisation, Government of India, Ministry of Planning and Implementation, Department of Statistics at Hyderabad,..
On 29.11.1985, the then Drugs Inspector, Park Town, II Range, Office of the Assistant State Drugs Controller Zone-1, inspected the premises of M/s. Sri Mahaveer Pharma Agencies (appellant no. 1 in Crl. A. No. 1034 of 2002) and found 68 bottles contai..
This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 04.10.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No. 2573 of 2006 whereby the High Court partly allowing the appeal acquitted Laxmibai – A-3, the mothe..
These appeals arise from the order dated 30.3.2004 of the Madras High Court in WP No. 2198/2003 filed by the President of Madras Bar Association (MBA for short) challenging the constitutional validity of Chapters 1B and 1C of the Companies Act, 1956(..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
