Court : Supreme Court of India
Brief : Whether a network provider can claim immunity under section 79 of Information Technology Act from the prosecution under NDPS Act?
Citation : (2008) 1 MLJ (Crl) 1145 (SC)
Sanjay Kumar Kedia Vs. Narcotic Control Bureau and Another
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act (61 of 1985), Section 8 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Rules (1987), Schedule I -
Information Technology Act (21 of 2000), Section 79 - Bail - Accused is a network providers charged under Sections 24, 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance
Act - Alleged that he used his network facilities provided by his Companies for arranging supply of Narcotic Drugs outside India - Accused and his associates are not innocent
intermediaries or network service providers - Overwhelming inculpatory evidence available against Appellant - Their business was only a facade and camouflage for more
sinister activities - Immunity from Prosecution under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act cannot be granted by Section 79 of Information Technology Act -
Appellant is not entitled for bail.
"Loved reading this piece by Raj Kumar Makkad?
Join LAWyersClubIndia's network for daily News Updates, Judgment Summaries, Articles, Forum Threads, Online Law Courses, and MUCH MORE!!"
Trouble Logging in? Try following the given steps -
1. Visit your inbox to find a confirmation mail from LAWyersClubIndia.
2. Click on the confirmation link and confirm your signup